n xntrx volvo said:
what about swapping the proportioning valve from another volvo?
the jtr v8 book lists the following:
gas 244 = 483 psi
gas 245 = 710 psi
gas 264 = 355 psi
gas 265 = 483 psi
diesel 244 = 355 psi
diesel 245 = 710 psi
not sure if it helps, but i'll search for some adj ones also.
any thoughts on a bracket group buy? i'll go around picking up cans or sell oranges on the off-ramp for the money.
This is some excellent info. Now, all we need to know is which direction those valves work. Does higher pressure mean more restriction or less. By analyzing the info, we see that the Wagons had Higher PSI, except for the 265, which is a V6 and heavier in the front, but not much. The Diesel 244 though has a fairly low pressure, yet the diesel motor is well known to weigh more in the front, thus needing stronger front brakes. My inclination, based on reading, would be that the more weight in the rear, would need higher pressure in the rear to account for the weight and even it out for the weight over the rear wheels. It almost makes the wagon seem like the better candidate for big brakes. So, lets start with this and see where it leads. After quickly reading re-reading "Brake Systems, OEM and Racing brake technology" by Mike Mavrigian and Larry Carley, they state that cars with larger front weight bias, like pickup trucks and minivans and front drive cars, can have up to 80-90% front brake Bias. Bias is also affected by the type of rear brakes used. If you have drum brakes in the rear, they are self energizing, and thus, need less pressure to apply a certain amount of force. Discs on the other hand, are not self energizing, and need more pressure to apply the same amount of force. So, since we have rear discs, and they are a good solid twin piston design with a 11" diameter, rear drive and decent front to rear bias, our cars most likely have more rear bias in the brakes than say a truck or minivan. Now that I have much larger front brakes, I have fully shifted the bias heavily to the front. If I had to guess, and I am, I would say I have gone from 65% front bias to 80-85% front bias. I would need to increase the rear bias by about 15% or a little more. Testing of course would prove this correct or wrong.
The break down of the valves goes in this order
264/244diesel......355 PSI
244/265.............483 PSI
245/245diesel......710 PSI
I know that I should have a 483 valve, but that could be wrong since I have a 242 and Dave B should have a 710. We do plan on pulling a few junk yard valves, and may experiment there first. Those parts are very easy to get. Removing the two rear valves is pretty darn easy to do.
"Holy Huge brakes Volvoman, we must get to those proportioning valves to avert the deadly front bias we have created!!!!!!!!"...."To the Volvo-Cave Volvoboy!!!!!!!!!!!"
Cheers
Paul Jones
PS. Frued did slip, then fall, then found a quarter