Here's the ancient thread...Project: Budget Handling write up -- some ride height photos on pg 2.Coilovers would definitely be the next big step suspension wise, but I never thought about just using smaller diameter springs.. Would also probably be nice to get stiffer shocks for the rear. Currently it's Billstein HDs in the rear and Bilstien touring struts, 25mm front bar and stock (19mm?) rear. I'm not in a hurry to buy more parts since I actually really like the way it feels. A tighter steering rack and more predictable lsd would be nice though.
I also plan on selling the wheels and getting something a little wider with backspacing.
Project: Budget Handling
1990 244 DL, M47, LH3.1, stock suspension with 145,000 miles when purchased, now at 155,000. Struts and strut mounts were original, but the mounts were fine. Rear shocks had been replaced with Boge. Torque rod bushings have been replaced with poly, and one rear trailing arm bushing has been...
www.turbobricks.com
Increased roll resistance on the front may help the diff work a little better, but that thing may never deliver fully on expectations.
I'd also agree on not being in a hurry now that the car feels good. Make one small change at a time and evaluate.
Some useful info here if you should choose to have Bilstein HDs custom valved. There's at least one place in NC that does it, I think...I still have a pile of strut inserts I need to send them, and a few rear shocks too.
I have used the 400/100 'stiff' R-sport rear shocks and I generally liked them with stock springs on a DD and we put them on our lemons 245 with cut overload springs. I can dig up the specs on the set I had done which worked very well with 475lb front springs and 200-250lb rear springs. The struts were 250nm/110nm, and I think the shocks were close to Dave's rear shocks at 300/120. The higher rebound (300 vs 225Nm for the original HD shock) is what makes the most noticeable difference because the rear doesn't pop up over dips anymore. That gets worse with more spring rate, too.