• Hello Guest, welcome to the initial stages of our new platform!
    You can find some additional information about where we are in the process of migrating the board and setting up our new software here

    Thank you for being a part of our community!

Rear axle choices Ford 9" or 8.8" or other? (2008-2022 bump)

What is it you are going to put together? What is it going in? I can't tell from reading your posts. I have a Ford 9" carrier with a Traction-lok unit in it. Also, the housing that is cut down and the axles that came with the rear axle. It was out of a 1966 T-Bird. I think the ratio is 2.88-3.0. A typical high speed rear axle of the time period. I was about to list it on Facebook and Craigslist.

I should have restated it - I only said it in the first post when I revived this thread. It's for my Volvo pickup truck which is getting the LR4/4l60E drivetrain. Many have said it's not a requirement, I just want to make sure the rear doesn't break if I decide I want to beat on it. This is a street use work truck, I want to be able to tow with it if need be. Not going to drag race or drift the thing, but do want to be able to do burnouts if I feel like it :p

I was looking for the 8.8 based on ppl's experience & ease of parts access. The parasitic drag of the 9 seems to be an issue - again I want this for street use, not necessary to have quick change gear set / drag / race use

I'll message you on the rear for details
 
Last edited:
A friend just weighed a 8.8 ready to drop into a 240, it came in at 216 pounds with brakes.
The 1031 was 170ish pounds with brakes. I added the "ish" as it was rigged with a chain and that's included in the weight, the 8.8 was with a nylon strap.

There's many flavors of 9in housings, but the lightweight ones are light! You can get them into the 165lb range with brakes if you want to.
With a cast-iron 3rd member you'll probably come in around 195-205 pounds if you use the stock (heavy!) 8.8 rear brakes and a regular 9in housing with 31 spline axles.

As much as I don't like the idea - I'm not sure the weight is a major concern though. I really don't want to spend 2K+ on a 9" rear put together.
 
Yea who knows I rebuilt it and a lot of other 8.8s and they always have a bit of slop compared to a split bolted in axle shaft. I think if it were to break on me I would just go straight to a sheet metal 9 inch or put 1031 tubes on the 8.8 center. Wouldn't surprise me if it's lighter too. Much better to weld to a nice new housing as well.

Fwiw if someone needs a 8.8 I have 3 of them all different flavors :D

Sent you a PM also.
 
As much as I don't like the idea - I'm not sure the weight is a major concern though. I really don't want to spend 2K+ on a 9" rear put together.
$1200-1400 gets you an all new rear end with whatever gear ratio you want, then add some 8.8 rear disks.

Housings used to be $600 with axles, but now they’re ~$700. You might be able to find a deal out there. Just add a 3rd member, brackets, and brakes.

By all means do the 8.8 f that’s your jam, but 9in is just a smidge more for all new parts that just bolt together.

 
$1200-1400 gets you an all new rear end with whatever gear ratio you want, then add some 8.8 rear disks.

Housings used to be $600 with axles, but now they’re ~$700. You might be able to find a deal out there. Just add a 3rd member, brackets, and brakes.

By all means do the 8.8 f that’s your jam, but 9in is just a smidge more for all new parts that just bolt together.


Thing is, 56" is too narrow. I'm shooting for 59" or wider - the stock rear on a 700 is around 60" according to Cpt. Bondo's early posts. I've head & seen (YT video) issues with the brake calipers contacting the frame members trying to use a narrow rear on a 700. Maybe it's fine on a 240.

That was the site I was looking at - even the 58" version, with a diff, comes out to over 1800+ then you have to add brakes, and I'd still be looking at a rear that's too narrow to not have potential interference issues.

My thinking is that with the 8.8, it's 59.25" - I can potentially use it as is or add 9" ends & try to get it even closer to 700 stock track width.


Screenshot 2024-07-12 at 7.28.49 AM.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top